Jumat, 15 Mei 2020

[PDF] Download Human Diversity: The Biology of Gender, Race, and Class by Charles Murray | Free EBOOK PDF English

Book Details

Title: Human Diversity: The Biology of Gender, Race, and Class
Author: Charles Murray
Number of pages:
Publisher: Twelve (January 28, 2020)
Language: English
ISBN: 1538744015
Rating: 4,3     34 reviews

Book Description

Review PRAISE FOR COMING APART:“I’ll be shocked if there’s another book this year as important as Charles Murray’s Coming Apart.”― David Brooks, The New York Times “Mr. Murray’s sobering portrait is of a nation where millions of people are losing touch with the founding virtues that have long lent American lives purpose, direction and happiness.”― Wall Street Journal “[An] incisive, alarming, and hugely frustrating book about the state of American society.”― Bloomberg Businessweek “‘Coming Apart brims with ideas about what ails America.”― Economist “[A] timely investigation into a worsening class divide no one can afford to ignore.”― Publisher’s Weekly “[Murray] argues for the need to focus on what has made the U.S. exceptional beyond its wealth and military power…religion, marriage, industriousness, and morality.”― Booklist (Starred Review) Read more About the Author Charles Murray is the W. H. Brady Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. He came to national attention first in 1984 with Losing Ground and most recently in 2012 with Coming Apart. He lives with his wife in Burkittsville, Maryland. Read more

Customers Review:

Charles Murray’s new book is fascinating, challenging, important and very useful. He begins by challenging three dogmas: Gender is a social construct; race is a social construct; and class is a function of privilege. This is the current orthodoxy among humanists and social scientists. It is a shaky orthodoxy, however. As he notes, if you enter a university department and ask people (privately) whether or not they subscribe to the orthodoxy they are likely to respond in a nuanced way. This is more likely to happen (I would add) in a hard social science department such as psychology. If you ask the question in an English department you are more likely to receive scowls than sympathetic, nuanced responses. That is because the English department is more likely to see itself in an advocacy role, one with an ideological underpinning that supports what is ultimately a political platform. Subscribers to the orthodoxy are particularly suspicious of biology, which can undercut their position. Since the psychologists are far closer to the sciences than to the humanities (and are already employing such devices as fMRI instruments to see clear differences in the male and female brain) they are far less invested in the ideology. The humanities, however, have taken conscious steps (steps which ultimately failed) to ‘theorize’ the sciences, see them through a postmodern lens and deflate their truth claims.Murray utilizes biology to challenge the orthodoxy and he does so definitively. He comforts us, however, by acknowledging that the results are not to be feared. “There are no monsters in the closet,” but rather a nuanced understanding of human nature and behavior that preserves our sense of human dignity while eschewing judgmental hierarchies that privilege one group over another.On the one hand, this is easily done. There are, e.g., demonstrable physical differences between the male and female brain. There are demonstrable susceptibilities to certain diseases that affect one group and not another. For scientist-specialists within the pertinent disciplines these are widely accepted and beyond dispute.Hence, the book is fascinating in its ability to challenge orthodoxy with state-of-the-art science and point up how odd and strange it is to see certain academics clinging to passé beliefs. That is not, however, the principal purpose of the book. The purpose is to provide the reader with a sense of what is now transpiring in the fields (particularly genetics and neuroscience) that have moved beyond the orthodoxy. This is challenging for two reasons: the nomenclature is difficult and complex and the scientific content is even more complex.Basically, what CM has done is immerse himself in material beyond his sociology/political science/policy comfort zone and taken vast amounts of work, digested it and presented it to the reader in as clear a manner as possible. This work is proceeding at different rates of speed and it promises, ultimately, to revolutionize social science. Hence, this is a futuristic book, brimming with curiosity and intellectual optimism. It says, in my own words, “No serious individual believes in the orthodoxy any longer, but what biology teaches us is not shattering, dangerous and to be feared. Here is where we are in the use of genetics and neuroscience at the moment . . . . Far from any fear of, e.g., genetic determinism, we will become accustomed to seeing a greater role played by happenstance and random occurrence. We will not speak so much of privilege or oppression, but more often of luck.”The book is very challenging because of the complexity of the subject but CM makes it as clear as one could possibly ask. While this is a massive book (500 pp.+) it reads relatively quickly; the core argument is contained within 300 pp., with subsidiary material (appendices, notes, index) of 200 pp. The appendices are both useful and fascinating (a crash course in statistics, an account of sexual dimorphism in humans and an account of sex differences in such things as brain volume). You want to know the nuances of ‘standard deviations’; you want to know the percentage of trans individuals . . . this is now your go-to source.My favorite chapter was the 15th, “Reflections and Speculations.” Here, CM offers his personal views of our current condition. He speculates; he philosophizes; he takes stands. While I disagree with him on some of his policy proposals (proposals which he himself recognizes as unworkable, in some cases) his overall views are powerful and resonant.Note: the book launch for HUMAN DIVERSITY at the American Enterprise Institute is available on Youtube. CM provides a 12-minute summary of the book which is very helpful. He itemizes the major postulates of the book. The “10 Propositions” can also be accessed via the “Look Inside!” feature of the Amazon.com page. They set out the principal points which he wishes to make in the book.Highly recommended.
It’s what you know that just ain’t so. And there is oh so much you “know” that just ain’t so.”The debate about nature versus nurture is not just one of many issues in social science. It is fundamental for everything involving human behavior.”I assume you have read the book description above so I will not regurgitate. My best description is that this is a very dense, fact packed meta analysis of decades of meta analyses all based on new tools for genetic research. It is not for the faint of heart. I expect to read it at least twice more before it sinks in. (Thank goodness I will not be tested.) A scholarly tome with extensive notes and references. Also some excellent “explainer” appendices. Together they are half the page count.The book explores progress made subsequent to the sequencing of the human genome. New tools mean new insights. Think looking at the stars. Human eye. Visual spectrum telescope. Radio telescope. Hubble. Each brought new knowledge. With respect to nature v nurture new tools made it possible to “drill down” on the nature side. As a result many “common” beliefs need to be reevaluated.For me the most difficult part of reading was trying to get my head around the explanations of genetic structure. Quite a struggle as the details were new to me. I think the second read will be easier.Dr. Murray explodes the PC myths about human diversity. But this is neither a “black and white” book nor “settled” science but an interim report. Much more to research and learn particularly with respect to non-American non-European populations.The most telling comment to me was about meritocracy. Dr. Murray points out that some people are just better equipped (primarily by high “g”) than others. So a pure meritocracy is impossible.A worthwhile read… I recommend it.
Human Diversity is one of the most interesting books I’ve ever read. In my personal quest to better understand my own Species, I’ve yearned to know more about these somewhat complex topics for years but have only found disorganized fragments, often written in highly scientific lingo for a tech journal that is hard for a non-specialist to interpret. In this book, Charles Murray actually takes the time to compile significant up-to-date information and then delivers it in a palatable, easy-to-read style. I’m very appreciative for the author’s efforts, he contributes much to Humankind with this book.